| 1 |
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 14:42 -0700, Chrissy Fullam wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> If the Trustees are not supposed to intervene in Gentoo development, that |
| 4 |
> being the technical direction of Gentoo, aren't they are in direct violation |
| 5 |
> of this by determining who cannot be a Council member by their own |
| 6 |
> membership? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Your reading that wrong. No one is saying they can't be on council. Just |
| 9 |
if they are, they can't be on trustees. Yes the same goes visa versa. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> ======================================== |
| 12 |
> <second addition> |
| 13 |
> Fmccor voted today that there should be a separation of Trustees and |
| 14 |
> Council. I see a direct conflict in how he was a Trustee and ran for |
| 15 |
> Council, |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
That conflict was brought up during the election process. He knew he |
| 18 |
would not win. Thus was pretty moot. Unless you want to nick pick on |
| 19 |
things that do not matter. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> but after not being elected he has now decided that no one else can |
| 22 |
> do it either? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Um nope, that was brought up and happened after he was elected to the |
| 25 |
board of trustees. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> He accepted his own Council nomination on 2008-06-05 and |
| 28 |
> responded to a series of 'questions to our nominees' on the same date. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
It's totally moot, so get over it. There are more important things to |
| 31 |
harp on and waste others time on. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
| 35 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
Archives