Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Section 2.2 Other States
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:04:37
Message-Id: 1208891073.2579.0@spike
In Reply to: [gentoo-nfp] Section 2.2 Other States by "William L. Thomson Jr."
Hash: SHA1

On 2008.04.22 00:10, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> I think for now we can drop this. Unless we want to expand to other > countries? I think countries makes more sense than another ´╗┐state of > the US. Unless states is the proper legal term there, not implying a > state of the US.
> -- > William L. Thomson Jr. > amd64/Java/Trustees > Gentoo Foundation > >
Other countries have other laws and different ways of doing things. If we expand to other countries, it will be under their laws, not New Mexicos'. This has to be a US states thing. - -- Regards, Roy Bamford (NeddySeagoon) a member of gentoo-ops forum-mods treecleaners trustees -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkgONsEACgkQTE4/y7nJvas9pwCeKTnpVB+CY17KkJ2bbSXl1630 sR0AnRSoujqGQTNJZ9HMLrJfRaEs5AYY =bRXo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-nfp] Section 2.2 Other States "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o>