1 |
Summary: |
2 |
The short version of the bug is that a non-trivial number of developers |
3 |
cannot commit with an SoB line because their company has not yet reviewed |
4 |
the new Gentoo Copyright GLEP, and so they lack company approval to attach |
5 |
SoB lines or agree to the DCO. |
6 |
|
7 |
The bug requests that a reprieve be granted until the company reviews the |
8 |
new policy and (hopefully) grants approval. This would be in the form of an |
9 |
allowlist where specific identities (approved by some delegate of council |
10 |
&& trustees) do not require an SoB line to commit for some period of time. |
11 |
|
12 |
Proposal: |
13 |
I propose the board grant this reprieve, for whitelisted accounts for 90 |
14 |
days, with no extension. Williamh will supply the initial list of accounts, |
15 |
to be reviewed verbally by a board delegate and a council delegate. |
16 |
|
17 |
If the company cannot return a decision in 90 days, we can revisit the |
18 |
motion with any updated data. |
19 |
|
20 |
If the company returns a decision before 90 days, the whitelist program |
21 |
will be terminated (regardless of decision reached.) Note that if the |
22 |
company decides that approval will not be granted, we will in effect be |
23 |
unable to accept commits from these developers on work time. |
24 |
|
25 |
As president, I will not vote on this motion, because I'm proposing it, so |
26 |
a tie vote is possible. |
27 |
|
28 |
Please vote on -nfp; a GPG signed mail is sufficient. |
29 |
|
30 |
-A |