| 1 |
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:19:55PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:51:17PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
> > If you have any concerns/objections to the policy which was outlined, |
| 4 |
> > which includes a mandatory requirement to sign a contributor license |
| 5 |
> > agreement and an option to also sign an assignment-like document based |
| 6 |
> > on the FSFe FLA, please speak up this week. |
| 7 |
> I've already said this before, but I guess I need to say it again: |
| 8 |
> If a contributor license is required to be signed, I'll have to |
| 9 |
> stop contributing to Gentoo. |
| 10 |
Did you read the entire email? We explicitly listed one of the options |
| 11 |
as (voluntary FLA/CLA AND mandatory DCO). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Could you clarify that you're objecting to that as well? In your case, |
| 14 |
you could elect NOT to sign the FLA/CLA. Regardless, all of your commits |
| 15 |
would have the DCO SoB signature. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
The kernel is where we got the mandatory DCO concept. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 21 |
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
| 22 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 23 |
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |
Archives