1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: [Sun May 01 2005, 04:13:12AM EDT] |
2 |
> I mean you can't even understand the results without a detailed |
3 |
> analysis. I was following the recent DPL elections, and at the end it |
4 |
> was basically, "Branden won, but nobody really seems to have a good |
5 |
> understanding of why or how." |
6 |
> |
7 |
> For example, this post: http://lwn.net/Articles/131551/ |
8 |
> |
9 |
> " The results are posted at |
10 |
> http://master.debian.org/~srivasta/leader2005_results.txt |
11 |
> http://master.debian.org/~srivasta/leader2005_results.png |
12 |
> The tally sheet is at: |
13 |
> http://master.debian.org/~srivasta/leader2005_tally.txt |
14 |
> The list of people voting is at: |
15 |
> http://master.debian.org/~srivasta/leader2005_voters.txt" |
16 |
> |
17 |
> None of which make _any_ sense to me with the exception of the voters list. |
18 |
|
19 |
Well, they didn't do a good job of pointing to supporting URLs. The |
20 |
two comments following the one you referenced are quite helpful. |
21 |
|
22 |
> Perhaps a voting method that regular people can actually understand |
23 |
> intuitively would be more helpful. |
24 |
|
25 |
The only voting method that people understand intuitively is plurality |
26 |
voting, used in most democratic countries in the world. It has the |
27 |
unfortunate result of favoring one extreme or the other; that is the |
28 |
reason that the U.S. has only two viable parties. Just because the |
29 |
method is intuitive and in wide use does not mean that it is fair or |
30 |
that it is the best for Gentoo. |
31 |
|
32 |
To be honest, now that I've seen what Debian has for voting, that's |
33 |
exactly what I'd like to see in Gentoo, EXCEPT that I'd like to make |
34 |
sure people aren't purely confused by it. The reason they posted all |
35 |
those numbers was for the sake of transparency, not for the sake of |
36 |
explanation. As one commenter noted, the explanation is available in |
37 |
other documents. |
38 |
|
39 |
Here is Condorcet voting in a nutshell: |
40 |
|
41 |
Ballots are counted by considering all possible sets of |
42 |
two-candidate elections from all available candidates. That is, |
43 |
each candidate is considered against each and every other |
44 |
candidate. A candidate is considered to "win" against another on |
45 |
a single ballot if they are ranked higher than their opponent. All |
46 |
the votes for candidate Alice over candidate Bob are counted, as |
47 |
are all of the votes for Bob over Alice. Whoever has the most |
48 |
votes in each one-on-one election wins. |
49 |
|
50 |
That is a quote from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method |
51 |
which goes into a lot more detail. |
52 |
|
53 |
Regards, |
54 |
Aron |
55 |
|
56 |
-- |
57 |
Aron Griffis |
58 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |