1 |
Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> I don't see any of this addressing distribution of a binary patch, |
3 |
> which is fairly reasonable, as it tries to make it as legally |
4 |
> difficult to create one as possible, so the possibility of |
5 |
> distrubution does not occur. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Adobe must know the patch exists. Since the above does not appear to |
8 |
> address the distrubution of a patch that is not supposed to exist, |
9 |
> has anyone asked Adobe about distrubution of the patch ? |
10 |
|
11 |
The good news is that this is no longer an issue. The next version is |
12 |
promised to work with libcurl.so.4 and fallback to libcurl.so.3 if |
13 |
necessary. [1] |
14 |
|
15 |
Thanks for the input! |
16 |
|
17 |
[1] http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2008/08/curl_tradeoffs.html |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Jim Ramsay |
21 |
Gentoo Developer (rox/fluxbox/gkrellm) |