| 1 |
On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 09:36:42PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 2018-08-19 at 14:42 -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Gentoo-bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/659620 |
| 4 |
> 1. Should we include all developers or only developers with gentoo.git |
| 5 |
> commit access? |
| 6 |
This is covered in my email response to b-man. Message-ID |
| 7 |
<robbat2-20180819T200416-417951123Z@××××××××××××××.net> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> 2. Shouldn't we set some minimal time-as-a-dev for this? |
| 10 |
This is covered in my email response to b-man. Message-ID |
| 11 |
<robbat2-20180819T200416-417951123Z@××××××××××××××.net> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Alternatively, require developers to return the token upon termination |
| 14 |
> of developer status, with allowance that after X years as a dev |
| 15 |
> the token is considered scrapped and does not need to be returned. |
| 16 |
As Treasurer, the keys will remain the property of the Foundation. |
| 17 |
Return it if X less than 2.5 years (by which time it will at least 50% |
| 18 |
depreciated in value). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I do expect at least one retiring dev to claim that they lost it to |
| 21 |
avoid returning it, but we'll be able to see by how (in)frequently it is |
| 22 |
used. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer |
| 27 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 28 |
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |
| 29 |
GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136 |
Archives