Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] An NFP request
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:30:20
In Reply to: [gentoo-nfp] An NFP request by Daniel Robbins
On Tuesday 13 April 2004 19:33, Daniel Robbins wrote:
> I have a request. If you agree with Kurt or Corey or someone else, rather > than just posting an "I agree with him" email, please explain why you agree > with the person you agree with. Explain how you view the NFP working. It's > helpful for me to hear it in your own words. > > Regards, > > Daniel
The issue for me is ownership of the copyright and trademarks. I'm not worried about you running off with it and making your fortune out of everyone's contributions. I'm concerned about what happens if you leave, or if you die unexpectedly. You'd be missed - but the project needs to survive that day. I see the NFP existing primarily as a legal entity to hold and defend the copyrights and trademarks. For me, that's its #1 purpose. And if the NFP isn't going to be doing that, I'd like to see the policy on copyright assignment changed, because that policy is no longer credible in my eyes. Legal ownership does mean that the NFP ultimately has to have the final say about what happens to Gentoo. My thoughts on that I'd like to stick into a follow-up email, if anyone thinks it's worth me sharing. The other thing I'd like to see the NFP doing is handling the financial side. I don't think it's the NFP's place to pay devs, but it can supply hardware, cover the costs of books, travel to conferences, that sort of thing. Best regards, Stu -- Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o Gentoo Developer Missed the php|cruise? GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C --


Subject Author
RE: [gentoo-nfp] An NFP request Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o>