| 1 |
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I understand that Trustees have a different role than Council members, |
| 3 |
> but given the difficulties in resolving some organizational issues for |
| 4 |
> the Foundation over the years, wouldn't it be easier for Foundation |
| 5 |
> members to choose their candidate(s) with some idea of what the |
| 6 |
> candidate(s) intend to do as Trustee? I see the wiki page for the |
| 7 |
> election includes a field for a manifesto, yet no nominee has one. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> It may give the Foundation a little momentum and encourage |
| 10 |
> participation. Thoughts? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
++ - in general I find it difficult to rank anybody over |
| 13 |
reopen-nomination if they can't be bothered to describe their goals. |
| 14 |
I don't see why it would be any less important for Trustees than |
| 15 |
Council members. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Rich |
Archives