1 |
I am ammending the proposal as jmbsvicetto suggested. |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
Some questions have been raised about how the nfp list is moderated. |
5 |
In that vein I propose the following. |
6 |
|
7 |
1. Affirm that access to the nfp list is a privilege not a right, even |
8 |
to Foundation members. |
9 |
2. Formally give revokable rights to moderate the list the the body(s) in |
10 |
charge of enforcing the CoC, currently comrel. Moderate in this case |
11 |
means to enact warnings/bans with reason given. |
12 |
2.1. The reason given needs to be public (not sure about this) |
13 |
2.2. Those having actions enacted against them are able to appeal to the |
14 |
trustees. |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Matthew Thode |