Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp <gentoo-nfp@l.g.o>
Subject: Fwd: [gentoo-nfp] Section 2.1 New Mexico
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:36:09
Sending to the list now.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto <jmbsvicetto@g.o>
Date: Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:33 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Section 2.1 New Mexico
To: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o>

 Hash: SHA1

 On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:05 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.  wrote:
 > Nothing here stands out to me as needing to be changed. Other than, per
 >  other thread on section 1.1. We might considering dropping the following
 >  part.
 >  "The foundation may, from time to time, designate a different address as
 >  its registered office or a different person as its registered agent, or
 >  both; provided, however, that such designation shall become effective
 >  upon the filing of a statement of such change with the Secretary of
 >  State of the State of New Mexico as is required by law."
 >  I think the statement made initial about what is set forth in the
 >  Certificate of Incorporation. Pretty much implies if the registered
 >  agent/address changes the articles should be updated. It's pretty much
 >  the law. So not sure we need to spell that out in the by laws.
 >  Even if we change it temporarily ( if that's possible ), you do that
 >  only by contact NM. If we change it and don't tell anyone. NM is still
 >  going to give out and use the registered agent/address on file at that
 >  time.

 I think we might as well leave it there. Although it's a legal
 requirement, I don't think it does any harm to make it explicit on the

 >  Otherwise no change to section IMHO. Going to move on to others, feel
 >  free to comment.
 >  --
 >  William L. Thomson Jr.
 >  amd64/Java/Trustees
 >  Gentoo Foundation


 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
 Gentoo- forums/userrel/Sparc/KDE
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list