1 |
Stuart Herbert wrote: [Mon Apr 11 2005, 12:39:51PM CDT] |
2 |
> Grant Goodyear wrote: |
3 |
> | We need to start collecting members pretty soon. My suggested |
4 |
> | guidelines for membership are: |
5 |
> | |
6 |
> | 1. Members must be currently active Gentoo developers who have been |
7 |
> | developers for at least a year. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I'd prefer this to be all developers / documenters / infra monkeys who |
10 |
> have completed their probation period. It seems discriminatory to allow |
11 |
> people to commit to the tree, but to not be eligible for membership of |
12 |
> the Foundation. |
13 |
|
14 |
The role of the foundation is to (a) protect Gentoo intellectual |
15 |
property and (b) collect and disburse funds. My thought was that both |
16 |
tasks require a fairly deep understanding of Gentoo which a newly-minted |
17 |
dev probably wouldn't have, but I'm certainly willing to listen to |
18 |
arguments for why I'm wrong. |
19 |
|
20 |
> | 2. Members must have requested membership. If you don't want to be |
21 |
> | a member of the foundation, you shouldn't have to be. (Indeed, the |
22 |
> | actual role of the foundation is quite limited.) |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Why not put in place automatic membership for all developers / |
25 |
> documenters / infra monkeys who have completed their probation period? |
26 |
|
27 |
Well, right now the proposed bylaws require 1/3 of the members to be |
28 |
present for voting to be valid, meaning over 100 people. I'm |
29 |
a tad worried that it would be very difficult to reach a quorum, and |
30 |
that it would be even more difficult if people who did not necessarily |
31 |
want to be involved in IP and budget issues are automatic members. |
32 |
|
33 |
If you have a better solution, I'm certainly interested. |
34 |
|
35 |
-g2boojum- |
36 |
-- |
37 |
Grant Goodyear |
38 |
Gentoo Developer |
39 |
g2boojum@g.o |
40 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
41 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |