| 1 |
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Daniel Robbins <drobbins@××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Daniel Robbins <drobbins@××××××.org> |
| 5 |
>> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> > |
| 7 |
>> > Yeah, man -- I know what you mean. Google can be notoriously difficult |
| 8 |
>> > to |
| 9 |
>> > use sometimes. Thanks for performing that shockingly hard research for |
| 10 |
>> > us. |
| 11 |
>> > |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> If you read my email you'll note that none of the figures I presented |
| 14 |
>> were the "mean wage." Hence the statement. Obviously it was a bit |
| 15 |
>> tangential |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Yes, just a tad tangential. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Then why reply at all, adding no value except to hurl unfounded |
| 21 |
insults? The meat of my email was the part you didn't reply to. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I stand by my point that determining the "mean wage" in the US is |
| 24 |
actually hard to do (at least as far as I can tell). For whatever |
| 25 |
reason you've taken issue with that statement, and hurled personal |
| 26 |
attacks around, without actually seriously looking into the matter. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I don't get why you seem to feel the need to hurl insults around and |
| 29 |
personalize things. It certainly isn't helpful to trying to resolve |
| 30 |
these issues instead of continuing to drive wedges. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Rich |
Archives