1 |
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 20:26 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Note that in my reading of the GLEP we have 30 days to *begin* the |
4 |
> election process. I expect in the end this will occur (feel free to |
5 |
> check the -council ml archives for status). |
6 |
|
7 |
During the discussion it was elected. As I had mentioned our election |
8 |
process takes 2 months. |
9 |
|
10 |
> I expect the council will start the election process and if they fail |
11 |
> to do so I will start it independently. |
12 |
|
13 |
Want to make some bets there? |
14 |
|
15 |
> It seems like you are always in a rush :P It takes time for folks to |
16 |
> communicate, please be patient. |
17 |
|
18 |
Oh really. So I never said 30 days was unrealistic. I never commented |
19 |
that the trustees barely got the process down to a little over a month. |
20 |
30 days is not practical. Which those that voted on the GLEP should have |
21 |
realized. But did not. |
22 |
|
23 |
But yes, it's me trying to rush this thing forward. When was the next |
24 |
council meeting schedule? So how many months will we go without a active |
25 |
or current council? |
26 |
|
27 |
> Even if we held an speedy election now, the council we have now is |
28 |
> still the council until that election is concluded. |
29 |
|
30 |
Yep, so what's our ETA to a new council. How many months from now before |
31 |
they can fully replace the existing council. Be 100% up and running. |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
35 |
amd64/Java/Trustees |
36 |
Gentoo Foundation |