| 1 |
On 08/22/2018 02:26 PM, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
> do you have any ideas on how we |
| 3 |
> can improve the security of our GPG infrastructure? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
(i) Using it more in our operations to begin with, including but not |
| 6 |
limited to [bugzilla] |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
(ii) Increase [WoT connectivity] / more fingerprint exchanges |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
(iii) more awareness and use of OpenPGP in general amongst developers, |
| 11 |
i.e it becomes part of routine to secure communications (how many are |
| 12 |
signing their emails in this discussion?) and perform integrity |
| 13 |
verification more extensively. Maybe we should start documenting the |
| 14 |
results of signature verification as part of package bump commit |
| 15 |
messages? Or do devs simply bump without verifying integrity of the |
| 16 |
upstream package to begin with? We should likely also work with |
| 17 |
upstreams that do not provide signatures for release tarballs to |
| 18 |
actually do so. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
References: |
| 21 |
[bugzilla] |
| 22 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/624262 |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
[WoT connectivity] |
| 25 |
https://download.sumptuouscapital.com/gentoo/openpgp-wot/gentoo-devs.pdf |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 30 |
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 31 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
Archives