| 1 |
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 13:15 -0700, Deedra Waters wrote: |
| 2 |
> I kind of like this idea, this would make the transision for new people |
| 3 |
> much easier with those who already have experience to help them along if |
| 4 |
> that makes sense... |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
That's part of my reasoning, also the idea of an ongoing dialog between |
| 7 |
the trustees and foo company/legal firm doesn't get interrupted by a |
| 8 |
whole new set of trustees because of some fluke voting thing. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> As for the number of trustees, I do like the fact that there's an odd |
| 11 |
> number on the current board so that there can't be a locked decision. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
I really think there should be a designated odd number before an actual |
| 14 |
election if for anything just to head off any controversy after the |
| 15 |
vote. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Brad Cowan <bcowan@g.o> |
| 19 |
Developer, |
| 20 |
Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/~bcowan |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB1F16A56 |
| 23 |
Key fingerprint = C408 75B9 E68D 26E2 EAAE 20CF 4D5E 293D B1F1 6A56 |
Archives