| 1 |
(Please don't reply to me directly, thanks) |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 00:19 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: |
| 4 |
> As I see it today, we need a set of bylaws that we can live with as |
| 5 |
> soon as we can get them, then develop the bylaws as we develop the |
| 6 |
> Foundation. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
OK, than allow me to suggest that the current proposal for gaining |
| 9 |
membership is fine, but I dislike the timeout. I don't think that |
| 10 |
someone should be forced to remain a developer just to be a Foundation |
| 11 |
member. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Perhaps if it were worded more so that it allowed for someone to retain |
| 14 |
their status only if they vote. That should be close enough to the |
| 15 |
current way things are without forcing people out. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 19 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
| 20 |
Games Developer |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives