Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: RE: [gentoo-nfp] Summary of NFP options
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 21:47:44
Message-Id: E1BDsEP-0000F7-67@smtp.gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Summary of NFP options by Paul de Vrieze
> I like the idea too. It makes a lot of sense, but the coop > should be a separate entity. It should have it's own goals > and policies. While the coop ("oss support foundation") would > be an important source of income for the NFP "gentoo > foundation" should be created as soon as possible as grinding > out the goals and policies of the coop will probably still > take quite a while.
Kurt clearly explained why the coop needs to be a separate entity from the main NFP. The coop is a good thing in itself. But combined with the NFP, the coop will first make setting up the NFP take way too long. Second, it will completely change the way decisions are made on the project, which people don't want. It will undermine developer authority, which developers obviously don't want. I was mistakenly trying to accomplish too many things under one roof by suggesting that we have a coop be the main entity for Gentoo. So the coop and the NFP need to be a separate entity. The NFP will be set up first, then we will worry about funding issues that can be addressed by setting up a coop. Just want to make sure that everyone knows my corrected opinion on this. Sincerely, Daniel -- gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-nfp] Summary of NFP options Spider <spider@g.o>