1 |
I see it now, my bad, it was in a linked thread and not inlined. |
2 |
|
3 |
Thanks for clarifying. |
4 |
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 5:38 PM Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> |
7 |
> |
8 |
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 7:34 PM Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com> wrote: |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> I should clarify, I was referring to why the prohibition was removed |
11 |
>> in mgorny's proposed revision as noted in the diff. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> |
14 |
> The rationale is *in* the email. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> -A |
17 |
> |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 2:15 PM Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
20 |
>> > |
21 |
>> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 4:32 PM Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com> wrote: |
22 |
>> >> |
23 |
>> >> I'd like to ask for the record why the prohibition was removed |
24 |
>> >> regarding concurrent |
25 |
>> >> membership as a trustee and on the gentoo council. |
26 |
>> > |
27 |
>> > |
28 |
>> > I'm not sure I follow. Currently it *is* prohibited to be a council member and a trustee. The amendments Michał mentioned are *proposed* amendments (from June). The idea being we would wait for a new board to vote on them (e.g. now). That being said, I intend to vote to abolish the prohibition you mention, but the rationale is right in the proposal (because the board needs more prospective members and excluding the council members harms that mission.) |
29 |
>> > |
30 |
>> > -A |
31 |
>> > |
32 |
>> > |
33 |
>> >> |
34 |
>> >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:55 AM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
35 |
>> >> > |
36 |
>> >> > Hello, |
37 |
>> >> > |
38 |
>> >> > Back in June 2018 a few Bylaw updates were submitted for the Trustees. |
39 |
>> >> > Since they haven't been processed yet, I'd like to re-submit them |
40 |
>> >> > for the next meeting. |
41 |
>> >> > |
42 |
>> >> > Unified version: |
43 |
>> >> > |
44 |
>> >> > render: https://gist.github.com/mgorny/4cfd3cc3784f693edfe21338b9a37704 |
45 |
>> >> > diffs: https://gist.github.com/mgorny/4cfd3cc3784f693edfe21338b9a37704/revisions |
46 |
>> >> > |
47 |
>> >> > Those are, in order: |
48 |
>> >> > |
49 |
>> >> > 1. Formatting fixes. |
50 |
>> >> > |
51 |
>> >> > thread: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-nfp/message/c58501db83a9a459c407a156a8c01850 |
52 |
>> >> > render: https://gist.github.com/mgorny/a27da12d627f19ba8bca09f799990b3d |
53 |
>> >> > diffs: https://gist.github.com/mgorny/a27da12d627f19ba8bca09f799990b3d/revisions |
54 |
>> >> > (thread also contains more readable word-diff) |
55 |
>> >> > |
56 |
>> >> > 2. Unifying and clarifying inactive member removal. |
57 |
>> >> > |
58 |
>> >> > Includes changes discussed in thread: |
59 |
>> >> > |
60 |
>> >> > a. removes special treatment of Gentoo devs -- everyone is removed |
61 |
>> >> > by inactivity, and accepted through contributions (being a Gentoo dev |
62 |
>> >> > being one of the ways of contributing). |
63 |
>> >> > |
64 |
>> >> > b. restores the original precise wording of how members are removed. |
65 |
>> >> > |
66 |
>> >> > thread: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-nfp/message/6b5093d69c006a47aa782f03497ba99e |
67 |
>> >> > render: https://gist.github.com/mgorny/66e6a3b72910162c8aaccbd0b12e3906 |
68 |
>> >> > diff: https://gist.github.com/mgorny/66e6a3b72910162c8aaccbd0b12e3906/revisions |
69 |
>> >> > |
70 |
>> >> > 3. Allowing Council members to serve as Trustees. |
71 |
>> >> > |
72 |
>> >> > thread: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-nfp/message/eb6bea1abb21b8c8ae29d0d24394305f |
73 |
>> >> > |
74 |
>> >> > 4. Lower member quorum to 1/10. |
75 |
>> >> > |
76 |
>> >> > thread: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-nfp/message/443c7d847564b0c4391b434db05d1f34 |
77 |
>> >> > |
78 |
>> >> > -- |
79 |
>> >> > Best regards, |
80 |
>> >> > Michał Górny |
81 |
>> >> |
82 |
>> |