Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Points to Ponder for Sundays Meeting.
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:47:33
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Points to Ponder for Sundays Meeting. by Chris Gianelloni
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Chris Gianelloni  wrote:
> (Please don't reply to me directly, thanks) > > > On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 00:19 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: > > As I see it today, we need a set of bylaws that we can live with as > > soon as we can get them, then develop the bylaws as we develop the > > Foundation. > > OK, than allow me to suggest that the current proposal for gaining > membership is fine, but I dislike the timeout. I don't think that > someone should be forced to remain a developer just to be a Foundation > member. > > Perhaps if it were worded more so that it allowed for someone to retain > their status only if they vote. That should be close enough to the > current way things are without forcing people out. >
I agree with the points Chris raised on the previous mail and with his proposal on the timeout.
> > > -- > Chris Gianelloni > Release Engineering Strategic Lead > Games Developer > -- > gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list > >
Regards, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto Gentoo- forums/userrel/Sparc/KDE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: iEYEARECAAYFAkgJ6T4ACgkQcAWygvVEyAIokQCfaXSkeMKQWgGxl+aZPRP9EUEQ M+IAn0WVKFJ7wSox7GOOd3wjpGTjnX8t =2uI3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list