1 |
On 24 Nov 2016 09:15, "Ulrich Mueller" <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> >>>>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Matthew Thode wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > I think your points were well argued, I'd be in favor of moving to |
6 |
> > cc-by-sa 4.0. I don't think we want or need ND or NC specified, |
7 |
> > though NC could be argued. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> One important point is to move to a license that is compatible with |
10 |
> the rest of our documentation. The ND or NC versions won't achieve |
11 |
> this because they are incompatible with CC-BY-SA. |
12 |
|
13 |
I agree. not only incompatible but NC or ND would also become a problem |
14 |
with Gentoo merchandising. |