| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Corey Shields wrote: |
| 5 |
> This would be ideal, but my concern is getting people to vote who don't |
| 6 |
> care to vote but were added as Foundation members by default. This may |
| 7 |
> not be an issue depending on how the voting is setup (having a timed |
| 8 |
> vote versus a quorum vote). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Well, we could modify it to be more like: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
a) All devs who have completed probation are eligible |
| 13 |
b) Membership must be requested and applied for |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Which is half of Stuart's proposal. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Also, you could add the requirement that if a voting member becomes |
| 18 |
inactive, that member is transformed into a non-voting member (or |
| 19 |
alternately removed from membership, if we decide against non-voting |
| 20 |
members). |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Thanks, |
| 23 |
Donnie |
| 24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
iD8DBQFCWsU6XVaO67S1rtsRAoIQAJ97cmuIebNO6PVZ7/VNiqcl9KpnNACfQktn |
| 28 |
TYAdr0cKkD70XKI3MTb2xRY= |
| 29 |
=3kzT |
| 30 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list |
Archives