| 1 |
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 6:19 PM Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera |
| 2 |
(klondike) <klondike@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> El 21/7/20 a las 13:47, Rich Freeman escribió: |
| 5 |
> > Splitting resources between the e.V. and Foundation is |
| 6 |
> > another way of mitigating risk as long as those orgs have no legal |
| 7 |
> > connection. Having mirrors that are completely personally owned by a |
| 8 |
> > few different community members and which don't have "Gentoo" anywhere |
| 9 |
> > in their name is another way of mitigating risk. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Take into account that there are a few GDPR provisions to take into account when transferring personal data to a third party, specially if you have no connection to it. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
True. There are workarounds though. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
One would include having people independently provide their personal |
| 16 |
data to anybody who needs it so that they don't have to transfer it |
| 17 |
between themselves. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Another would be to have a non-EU-based entity collect the data and |
| 20 |
avoid owning any infra in the EU, and they would disseminate the data |
| 21 |
further, so that they wouldn't fall under EU jurisdiction. That isn't |
| 22 |
to say that we wouldn't treat personal data with care - just that |
| 23 |
there would be no red tape around it to demonstrate compliance to an |
| 24 |
external regulator. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I would minimize collection of personal data in any case. You don't |
| 27 |
have to protect info you don't collect, and you can contain what info |
| 28 |
you do have to those entities that require it. Even if the eV has |
| 29 |
somebody's address to pay them for something, we don't need to share |
| 30 |
that with whatever entity is running a mailing list or bugzilla |
| 31 |
server. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Rich |
Archives