| 1 |
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Sergey Kuleshov wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'd second almost everything Caleb said. I do feel, that Daniel should |
| 3 |
> come back. And if he does I'll try to come back to the developers |
| 4 |
> (which I left some time ago). not that I think this will make any |
| 5 |
> difference, but just wanted to express my opinion as well. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> and when I hear peoples' concerns about handing him control of Gentoo, |
| 8 |
> I have only one question in return - any better options? cause what we |
| 9 |
> have now proved to be quite a failure. |
| 10 |
We'll if Gentoo is such a failure why do users still bother to even post their |
| 11 |
opinions? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Sure we've never really found the perfect organization for us (not with |
| 14 |
drobbins nor without). In some areas we've had a bumpy ride and in many many |
| 15 |
others progress is silently happening and others not so silent, ie see the |
| 16 |
planet. Like other voluntary organizations progress speed can vary greatly. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Yet acknowledging that we have a problem doesn't make drobbin the silver |
| 19 |
bullet. He already left the project twice. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Bringing on a president to rule all of Gentoo land which have a tradition of |
| 22 |
being pretty independent and sometimes chaotic would be quite a change. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
[snip] |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen |
| 28 |
Gentoo Linux Security Team |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives