Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp <gentoo-nfp@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Section 4.1 Member Classes
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 01:52:42
Message-Id: 1211507557.30194.14.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Section 4.1 Member Classes by Luca Barbato
1 On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 03:26 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
2 >
3 > > Look there is a need for organization. The initial wording of the
4 > > foundation charter, straight up says the foundation is a result of
5 > > increased size.
6 >
7 > s/foundation/council
8
9 "The Gentoo distribution is maturing rapidly. Since its birth in 1999
10 the distribution has evolved to one of the top Linux distributions
11 available today. The incorporated technologies including Portage, the
12 software management system, are frequently seen as major software
13 breakthroughs.
14
15 In order to sustain the current quality and development swiftness the
16 Gentoo project needs a framework for intellectual property protection
17 and financial contributions while limiting the contributors' legal
18 exposure. The Gentoo Foundation will embody this framework without
19 intervening in the Gentoo development. This latter aspect should be seen
20 as a clear separation between coordinating the Gentoo development and
21 protecting Gentoo's assets. Both are distinct concepts requiring
22 different skills and working methods.
23
24 The Gentoo Foundation decouples necessary bureaucracy from development,
25 providing faster and higher quality results as the developer can now
26 focus his attention completely at the community and his responsibilities
27 (being software, documentation, infrastructure or others).
28 "
29
30 http://www.gentoo.org/foundation/en/
31
32 --
33 William L. Thomson Jr.
34 amd64/Java/Trustees
35 Gentoo Foundation

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature