1 |
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 21:13 +0100, Steve Long wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Well I'd argue Council is Executive body since the main work of the |
4 |
> organisation is the technology (with perhaps infra as CTO) but that's an |
5 |
> aside. |
6 |
|
7 |
Infra would never qualify as CTO. But would fall under the Council's |
8 |
sphere as they do now. Short of for funding requests, which the council |
9 |
doesn't oversee. Infra would be CIO if anything. |
10 |
|
11 |
Just for reference |
12 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_technical_officer |
13 |
|
14 |
The only diff here, being our CTO is a council or body. We could suggest |
15 |
to the council, they appoint a lead. But that's really up to them. I |
16 |
have no problem with the CTO as it applies to getting being a group |
17 |
comprised of several. Versus a single person. |
18 |
|
19 |
Now infra being identified as the CIO under the CTO is totally possible. |
20 |
In fact under the responsibilities section of CTO above. It mentions it |
21 |
could be in that order. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
25 |
amd64/Java/Trustees |
26 |
Gentoo Foundation |