Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Non-contactable Members
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:05:35
Message-Id: 16bd8206c60.27c9.26c0c48bea5b0fcc301150500db51b7d@iee.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Non-contactable Members by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 On 9 July 2019 7:53:50 pm "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> wrote:
2
3 > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 07:48:42PM +0100, M. J. Everitt wrote:
4 >> On 9 July 2019 7:43:33 pm Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o> wrote:
5 >> > The following list of individuals currently have email addresses on file with
6 >> > the Foundation which have bounced from the gentoo-foundation-announce mailing
7 >> > list. If you intend to participate in this election cycle please email
8 >> > trustees@g.o with an updated email address.
9 > ...
10 >> > On Behalf of the Trustees,
11 >> Forgive me, but haven't these members been retired??
12 > Retiring a developer does not automatically revoke your Foundation
13 > membership.
14 >
15 > I'd like to point out this clause under bylaw 7.1 [1]:
16 > "Each member shall be responsible for notifying the foundation of
17 > changes to such member's, electronic mail address and public gpg key."
18 >
19 > [1]
20 > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Foundation:Bylaws#Section_7.1._Books_and_Records
21 >
22 > --
23 > Robin Hugh Johnson
24 > Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer
25 > E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
26 > GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
27 > GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136
28
29 How does this reconcile with the requirement that all trustee members must
30 be Gentoo developers?! And/or can only become members as a result of
31 competing the developer quizzes. This seems rather bizarre, no?!

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-nfp] Non-contactable Members Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>