| 1 |
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Specifically regarding your proposal, I'm not sure what outcome you are |
| 5 |
> actually expecting. Explicitly stating that the Foundation owns and |
| 6 |
> controls assets that it literally owns and controls seems a bit |
| 7 |
> tautological (and thus of little value.) It might be useful to state that |
| 8 |
> in that event of a 'hostile takeover' type situation the board will pursue |
| 9 |
> all legal remedies; but this too seems somewhat tautological (but I'm open |
| 10 |
> to more leeway here.) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Yes, it is unclear as to how specifically this is protected against, and if |
| 14 |
it is the case that sufficient safeguards are in place, and that everyone |
| 15 |
involved in -infra is aware that the Foundation essentially is ultimately |
| 16 |
'in charge' of the servers, then this issues, as far as I can tell, is |
| 17 |
resolved. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-Daniel |
Archives