Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Deedra Waters <dmwaters@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Summary of NFP options
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 01:13:22
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.58.0404122012010.11008@simba
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Summary of NFP options by Corey Shields
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 I agree with corey on this. He's said what I've been thinking, but with
5 much better wording.:)
6
7
8 On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Corey Shields wrote:
9
10 > Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:05:15 -0500
11 > From: Corey Shields <cshields@×××××××.edu>
12 > Reply-To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
13 > To: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
14 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Summary of NFP options
15 >
16 > --[PinePGP]--------------------------------------------------[begin]--
17 >
18 > The original purpose of the NFP organization, as I understand it, is to
19 > protect Gentoo from becoming a corporate entity. That is it. People were
20 > afraid of someone running away and making money off of their contributions.
21 > And I think that the corporate-protective NFP is what the development
22 > community wants. The purpose right now should not be to make money or try
23 > and support x number of developers financially, as (almost) everyone is
24 > working happily within their own capacities right now. Development should
25 > continue as it has been, because while there are quirks and problems, as a
26 > whole it works, or else we wouldn't have such a kick ass distribution.
27 >
28 > Keep the focus on protecting Gentoo from corporate ties. Let the developers
29 > continue to do their work the way they are currently doing it. I know there
30 > is a concern about lack of QA and R&D, but as Gentoo gains popularity and
31 > more people (and organizations) jump on board, there will be resources to
32 > fill those roles just as there have been resources to create ebuilds.
33 >
34 > Basically, I think that the corporate ties issue should be solved first. The
35 > resource issue is new and needs to be tackled later, as the NFP has been in
36 > limbo too long..
37 >
38 > Cheers!
39 >
40 > -Corey
41 >
42 > On Monday 12 April 2004 07:39 pm, Daniel Robbins wrote:
43 > > Hi guys,
44 > >
45 > > Here is a very short summary of the NFP progress so far:
46 >
47 > --
48 > Corey Shields - IU Unix Systems Support Group
49 > http://ussg.iu.edu/~cshields
50 >
51 > My PGP/GPG public encryption key is at:
52 > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/~cshields/cshields_pub_key.asc
53 > GPG fingerprint: 78A8 E5EB E455 0A90 F392 59BC A6AF F8A3 A304 1453
54 > --[PinePGP]-----------------------------------------------------------
55 > gpg: Signature made Mon Apr 12 20:05:15 2004 CDT using DSA key ID A3041453
56 > gpg: Good signature from "Corey Shields <cshields@×××××××.edu>"
57 > gpg: aka "Corey Shields <cshields@g.o>"
58 > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
59 > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
60 > Primary key fingerprint: 78A8 E5EB E455 0A90 F392 59BC A6AF F8A3 A304 1453
61 > --[PinePGP]----------------------------------------------------[end]--
62 >
63
64 - --
65 Gentoo Linux: dmwaters@g.o
66 http://www.gentoo.org
67 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
68 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
69
70 iD8DBQFAez6OU5AGPOTGNc8RAnezAJ9OfpZyXaInawgUmemguAZYpMEFNQCcCa/7
71 MUCbcrBp6FITke4ybcjW/ec=
72 =/cgK
73 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
74
75 --
76 gentoo-nfp@g.o mailing list