Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o>
To: Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-nfp@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Section 3.3. Special Meetings
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:37:00
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Section 3.3. Special Meetings by Ferris McCormick
On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 21:16 +0000, Ferris McCormick wrote:

> > I believe we should establish a mailing list for foundation members > only just to handle this sort of situation. Maybe something like > foundation@g.o
Pretty sure this is it :) I thought about mentioning that, but then that's just creating another list. When this one pretty much exists already for that purpose. So it's mostly a matter of making sure those on the member roster are also signed up to the -nfp mailing lists. Granted some have stated they don't want to be members. But those that are members. We can surely impose the requirement to be on -nfp. Almost have direct control over that via infra :). Short of them removing themselves, us adding them back, so on and so forth. :(
> I don't see how to do a petition --- perhaps my > brain is numb by now --- but it would be a bit easier I think if we can > do it.
Yeah, that's the ideal way to go for any group actions 10% or more of the members would like to see the foundation take or act upon. Meeting or not, but likely would be decided upon at a meeting. Indirect call for a meeting either way. But I am with you, I like to think of myself as creative. But have little to no thoughts atm how we could go about an electronic petition. What happens when I go into business mode from creative and development :( -- William L. Thomson Jr. amd64/Java/Trustees Gentoo Foundation


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-nfp] Section 3.3. Special Meetings "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-nfp] Section 3.3. Special Meetings Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>