Gentoo Archives: gentoo-nfp

From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
To: gentoo-nfp <gentoo-nfp@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Section 3.3. Special Meetings
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:58:39
Message-Id: 1209491915.2592.2@spike
In Reply to: [gentoo-nfp] Section 3.3. Special Meetings by "William L. Thomson Jr."
Hash: SHA1

On 2008.04.28 22:02, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> For the most part this section is fine. One thing that does need to > be > changed is the following > > "when requested in writing by not less than ten percent (10%) of all > members entitled to vote at the meeting." > > I think we can exclude the last bit, entitled to vote at meetings. > Members aren't voting at meetings, board members, and officers are. > Thus
> -- > William L. Thomson Jr. > amd64/Java/Trustees > Gentoo Foundation > >
William, That's only a question of mechanisation. We hold the meeting, come to the point of a vote, then adjourn for the vote to take place using our normal method. At the end of the voting period, the meeting reconvenes. The members have effectively voted at the meeting. More generally, a lot of the things in the NM statutes at are not written around the concept of a virtual Foundation such as we want to be. As Ferris has already reminded me, its not the letter of the law that counts, its how it has been interpreted down the years by the courts. As I'm not a US citizen, my knowledge of these things is a lot less than all of the other trustees, so I'll go with the flow. If we want to go away from the interpreted NM law, even if we know what it is, I don't think there will be any issues unless someone decides to mount a challenge in the courts. Its hard to think of a motive for that. In short, I'm reasonably comfortable with mapping the intent of the law onto a suitable virtual framework for Gentoo. As a safeguard for us, should be put such a set of bylaws to a vote of the members ? I know we don't need to but we could seek membership endorsement at the next trustee election. I suppose getting reelected is endorsement. - -- Regards, Roy Bamford (NeddySeagoon) a member of gentoo-ops forum-mods treecleaners trustees -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkgXYcsACgkQTE4/y7nJvavnbACfQRHp0Bc6CsCPl0rxaCiPQnZv riMAoPlPJyroJtevDlQC82RZ9rM+Bj8U =LwEd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-nfp@l.g.o mailing list