| 1 |
On 22-03-2006 00:07:09 -0600, Kito wrote: |
| 2 |
> >I assume you're asking about the versions of ebuilds for gcc? I'm |
| 3 |
> >using the portage tree that the wiki points to. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Sorry, I haven't used the vanilla gcc yet, just the apple branch. Can you paste |
| 6 |
> the output of emerge -pev gcc please? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Fabian do you have any advice on a Fedora bootstrap? I've only tested prefix on |
| 9 |
> Gentoo/ppc, which is probably cheating ;) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
First, I think the pycrypto crap is due to not having python from |
| 12 |
portage installed. I think I did that first. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Second, I think it's fairly important to get both GCC and binutils built |
| 15 |
in the prefix, because they control the behaviour of where to find files |
| 16 |
and stuff. I know binutils isn't working fully correct at the moment, |
| 17 |
but it allowed me to come quite far. I just recall that I priorised on |
| 18 |
these things, because getting a build environment that is portage |
| 19 |
controlled, makes the assumptions of the tree come true. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Third, the first days toying with my Fedora install was just hacking |
| 22 |
around, cheating with symlinks and stuff, and getting as much of the |
| 23 |
symlinks replaced by portage versions. Some things suddently started to |
| 24 |
work after I for instance installed gawk in my prefix. (Symlink wasn't |
| 25 |
good enough?!? No idea on that.) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
So concluding, I guess I should spend some time in doing it from scratch |
| 29 |
again, and keeping a much better log around of the steps I took. Maybe |
| 30 |
exg's bootstrap scripts can help speeding that up. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 35 |
Gentoo for Mac OS X Project |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |
Archives