Gentoo Archives: gentoo-osx

From: Kito <kito@g.o>
To: gentoo-osx@l.g.o
Cc: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Renaming of ${DEST}
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:27:57
Message-Id: 96EC9334-9887-4302-A8C7-291492CDBDC6@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Renaming of ${DEST} by Grobian
1 On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Grobian wrote:
2
3 > On 22-03-2006 11:03:09 -0600, Kito wrote:
4 >> On Mar 22, 2006, at 5:47 AM, Grobian wrote:
5 >>> What about using ${EPREFIX} instead of ${PREFIX}? ${PREFIX} at
6 >>> least
7 >
8 >> Yeap, I was thinking about this too. It should be done. Maybe we
9 >> can tackle
10 >> both of these this weekend.
11 >
12 > You should at least tackle both at once, IMO ;)
13
14 FINE! I'll start checking in the portage changes to svn. That being
15 said, in case any of you are in the habit of running the svn version,
16 it'll be broken for a bit.
17
18 > I can help with changing ebuilds/eclasses, as I'm currently in a fight
19 > with binutils, gcc and glibc anyway.
20
21 Ok, why don't you keep all your changes local and we'll try to
22 coordinate a big atomic commit this weekend perhaps?
23
24 --Kito
25
26
27
28
29 --
30 gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Freeze of the prefixed portage tree Grobian <grobian@g.o>