1 |
On a related note: |
2 |
What about using ${EPREFIX} instead of ${PREFIX}? ${PREFIX} at least |
3 |
clashes with the toolchain-funcs eclass, and might as well be used by |
4 |
other packages. |
5 |
|
6 |
Does it make sense to anyone? |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
On 20-03-2006 09:19:03 +0100, Grobian wrote: |
10 |
> On 19-03-2006 16:13:19 -0600, Kito wrote: |
11 |
> > Howdy, |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > I forgot to mention this at the meeting. I found a few packages (not in |
14 |
> > portage currently thankfully) that have namespace collisions with the ${DEST} |
15 |
> > var. My thought is to change it to ${DD}, as in 'DESTDIR'. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > Thoughts? Better idea for a name? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> The only thing that comes to my mind as alternative is "${EDEST}". |
20 |
> Might be slightly more self-explanatory. I don't care much about which |
21 |
> of the two it will become, as long as the change is done atomic ;) |
22 |
> |
23 |
> |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Fabian Groffen |
27 |
Gentoo for Mac OS X Project |
28 |
-- |
29 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |