Gentoo Archives: gentoo-osx

From: Grobian <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-osx@l.g.o, gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Renaming of ${DEST}
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:48:05
Message-Id: 20060322114737.GB16425@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Renaming of ${DEST} by Grobian
1 On a related note:
2 What about using ${EPREFIX} instead of ${PREFIX}? ${PREFIX} at least
3 clashes with the toolchain-funcs eclass, and might as well be used by
4 other packages.
5
6 Does it make sense to anyone?
7
8
9 On 20-03-2006 09:19:03 +0100, Grobian wrote:
10 > On 19-03-2006 16:13:19 -0600, Kito wrote:
11 > > Howdy,
12 > >
13 > > I forgot to mention this at the meeting. I found a few packages (not in
14 > > portage currently thankfully) that have namespace collisions with the ${DEST}
15 > > var. My thought is to change it to ${DD}, as in 'DESTDIR'.
16 > >
17 > > Thoughts? Better idea for a name?
18 >
19 > The only thing that comes to my mind as alternative is "${EDEST}".
20 > Might be slightly more self-explanatory. I don't care much about which
21 > of the two it will become, as long as the change is done atomic ;)
22 >
23 >
24
25 --
26 Fabian Groffen
27 Gentoo for Mac OS X Project
28 --
29 gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Renaming of ${DEST} Michael Haubenwallner <michael.haubenwallner@×××××××.at>
Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Renaming of ${DEST} Kito <kito@g.o>