| 1 |
Please ignore that I c&p'd this from my irc client window. I |
| 2 |
realized leaving little messages on #gentoo-osx isn't the best way to |
| 3 |
get in touch with people! ;-) Please find my ramblings below. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
__armando |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
fafhrd: anyone out there see my message on this channel yesterday? |
| 8 |
[3:00pm] fafhrd: I'm curious about what others feel the "right" |
| 9 |
userland for gentoo/portage on osx is |
| 10 |
[3:00pm] fafhrd: meaning, sure, we need to deal with |
| 11 |
USERLAND="BSD" (or "Darwin" as it were) when we bootstrap |
| 12 |
[3:01pm] fafhrd: but, after that, can't the equivalent of `emerge |
| 13 |
sysem -e` be run to basically free the libraries from linking against |
| 14 |
the base system? |
| 15 |
[3:01pm] fafhrd: anyways, this all started because the current |
| 16 |
bootstrap-prefix script attempts to build Apple's gcc, which fails, |
| 17 |
but gnu gcc builds fine for me |
| 18 |
[3:02pm] fafhrd: so I'd like to get some consensus about what kind of |
| 19 |
USERLAND we're aiming for, as I keep hacking on this stuff |
| 20 |
[3:02pm] fafhrd: personally, I'd like to move towards building it's |
| 21 |
own internal GNU style USERLAND |
| 22 |
[3:02pm] fafhrd: as I have no urge to follow Apple willy nilly |
| 23 |
[3:02pm] fafhrd: thoughts? |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |
Archives