| 1 |
Grobian- |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
We have a bunch of prefixed ebuilds that we would like to contribute. |
| 4 |
I'm not sure why the opposition to "experimental", but if it needs to |
| 5 |
be hosted externally, then I'm in favor of that. .. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
BTW, where is Kito? (Long time no hear...) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
-matt |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
On 6/13/06, Grobian <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 12 |
> With the current climate within Gentoo regarding anything "experimental" |
| 13 |
> hosted on official Gentoo hardware or whatever, it may not be the best |
| 14 |
> any more to have our work on Gentoo resources. Especially with our |
| 15 |
> requirements of letting outsiders contribute, it seems to be more and |
| 16 |
> more unpleasant that our tree is currently hosted in Gentoo SVN. |
| 17 |
> In order to change this, I think we have two options: either self |
| 18 |
> hosting, or letting it host by someone else, like SourceForge. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I have a preference for letting our tree being hosted by SourceForge |
| 21 |
> using SVN. We can make a SVN snapshot and put it there, then add |
| 22 |
> whoever we want to have contributing there. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> The only drawback of such move would be that we decouple from Gentoo, |
| 25 |
> which might be politically not such a good move. However, I think I |
| 26 |
> don't care. I would be happy if finally people could work on it. Any |
| 27 |
> input on this? |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> -- |
| 30 |
> Fabian Groffen |
| 31 |
> Gentoo for Mac OS X Project |
| 32 |
> -- |
| 33 |
> gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |
Archives