Gentoo Archives: gentoo-osx

From: Hasan Khalil <gongloo@g.o>
To: gentoo-osx@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-osx] Java virtuals, etc
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:30:14
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-osx] Java virtuals, etc by Grobian
On Aug 7, 2005, at 11:01, Grobian wrote:

> Hasan Khalil wrote: > >> divides up the packages, I left him to do his thing. To save you >> the trouble, here's the important stuff: >> >>> macos $ grep -R java . >>> ./10.3/package.provided:dev-java/javascriptcore-96 >>> ./10.3/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jdk- >>> ./10.3/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jre-bin- >>> ./10.4/package.provided:dev-java/javascriptcore-96 >>> ./10.4/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jdk- >>> ./10.4/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jre-bin- >>> ./virtuals:virtual/jdk dev-java/sun-j2sdk >>> ./virtuals:virtual/jre dev-java/sun-jre-bin >>> ./progressive/package.provided:dev-java/javascriptcore-96 >>> ./progressive/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5 >>> ./progressive/package.provided:dev-java/sun-jre-bin- >>> ./progressive/virtuals:virtual/jdk dev-java/sun-jdk >>> > > From this grep it looks to me like the problem is still the same. > virtuals/jdk is satisfied by dev-java/sun-j2sdk, but 10.3 and 10.4 > only provide dev-java/sun-jdk- So basically, the problem > is still there, or I and repoman don't seem to understand properly > how this works (which is most properly in this case).
You're right. I'm sorry, and I stand corrected. Looking at the dev-java/sun-jdk ebuilds, it provides both virtual/jdk and vritual/jre; I really don't see a point with having dev-java/sun- jre-bin in the picture at all, given this. I think, then, that the proper solution should be as such:
> virtuals:virtual/jdk dev-java/sun-jdk > virtuals:virtual/jre dev-java/sun-jdk > */package.provided:dev-java/sun-jdk-
Kito: Any input? Is the above alright on your end?? -- Hasan Khalil eBuild and Porting Co-Lead Gentoo for Mac OS X


File name MIME type
PGP.sig application/pgp-signature


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-osx] Java virtuals, etc Kito <kito@g.o>