Gentoo Archives: gentoo-osx

From: m h <sesquile@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-osx@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Ready to go on Ubuntu...
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:38:15
Message-Id: e36b84ee0604101238n683811bj1943998bf37ca290@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-osx] [PREFIX] Ready to go on Ubuntu... by Grobian
1 On 4/10/06, Grobian <grobian@g.o> wrote:
2 > On 10-04-2006 20:25:24 +0000, m h wrote:
3 > > On 4/8/06, grobian@g.o <grobian@g.o> wrote:
4 > > > On 07-04-2006 18:54:44 -0700, m h wrote:
5 > > > > Complaint that "emake" wasn't found, which is found in
6 > > > > usr/portage/bin. I added ${PREFIX}/usr/portage/bin to DEFAULT_PATH in
7 > > > > make.globals and continued. Not sure if this is a regression (could
8 > > > > be user error).
9 > > >
10 > > > I've had this too. Setting DEFAULT_PATH means you override it, not
11 > > > append to it. Copy the path from make.globals and add the paths to that
12 > > > line to get what you expect.
13 > > >
14 > >
15 > > Just clarifying here. You mean hardcode the path to emake int the
16 > > ebuild which calls it?
17 >
18 > No, if you set DEFAULT_PATH in your make.conf, make sure you start by
19 > modifying what is in make.globals. The one in make.globals is like the
20 > default setting, and if you set it, you lose the defaults. (like then
21 > you do "export PATH=$HOME/bin" in bash for instance).
22 >
23 >
24 I've only been editing the make.globals one.... are you suggesting I
25 edit it in make.conf now?
26
27 --
28 gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list