| 1 |
On 12/14/05, Grobian <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 14-12-2005 22:29:36 +0100, Dirk Schnberger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > > Further on, I think Gentoo is more than a stand alone system, because it |
| 4 |
> > > > installs other standalone applications. |
| 5 |
> > > > This seems to be some mismatch. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > > I don't understand what you're trying to say here. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > If I underood this correctly, the idea is to use /Library/Gentoo as a prefix |
| 10 |
> > for the prospective prefixed install. |
| 11 |
> > But the packages which should be installed don't really belong to Gentoo, it |
| 12 |
> > merely works as some kind of installer. |
| 13 |
> > So I don't think /Library/Gentoo is really appropriate. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Ok. |
| 16 |
> To be honest, I don't really care about the name, but I don't feel like |
| 17 |
> having huge discussions about it either. We just chose something more |
| 18 |
> sexy than /sw. Besides that, having chosen a default, doesn't mean you |
| 19 |
> need to use it. We could name it like |
| 20 |
> /Library/GentooPortageInstalledPackages, but that really looks ugly in |
| 21 |
> your paths. Luckly there is shell completion, but it still is a bit too |
| 22 |
> ugly to me. |
| 23 |
> Finally, this is just a minor side issue, that I feel is completely |
| 24 |
> irrelevant regarding the state of the project. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Amen. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |
Archives