| 1 |
On 16-03-2006 12:27:21 -0800, m h wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 3/16/06, Grobian <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 16-03-2006 12:14:18 -0800, m h wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On 3/16/06, m h <sesquile@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > I'll try copying over the normal tree from my gentoo box. |
| 6 |
> > > > |
| 7 |
> > > I fixed it by doing an absolute symlink rather than relative |
| 8 |
> > > ie: |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > I remember having the same issue. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > > $ ln -s /tmp/Mar16/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.1 |
| 13 |
> > > etc/make.profile |
| 14 |
> > > instead of |
| 15 |
> > > $ ln -s usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.1 etc/make.profile |
| 16 |
> > > |
| 17 |
> > > Now I need to find out why libc is unavailable... |
| 18 |
> > > |
| 19 |
> > > Portage 2.1.10 (default-linux/x86/2005.1, gcc-3.4.3, unavailable, |
| 20 |
> > > 2.6.9-5.EL i686) |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > I thought I emerged it... but before that... I have no idea if I had it |
| 23 |
> > or not. Makes sense a bit that portage doesn't know it has it. Not |
| 24 |
> > sure whether this is vital or not. |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> Hmmm, so should I just try and proceed with emerge system? |
| 28 |
> I get : |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "dev-libs/openssl" have been masked. |
| 31 |
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: |
| 32 |
> - dev-libs/openssl-0.9.8a (masked by: missing keyword) |
| 33 |
> # Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o> (05 Jul 2005) |
| 34 |
> # Masked for testing, as it breaks api |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
That is correct, lol. I tried doing openssl, (by unproviding it and |
| 38 |
unmasking it locally) but that horribly fails due to some problem with |
| 39 |
zlib (it seems my setup refuses to take zlib out of my prefix, and |
| 40 |
fedora ships by default with a buggy and too old zlib according to |
| 41 |
openssl's configure) |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
If you copied my profile, you need to put the openssl provide back in. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
> I can go through and deal with these, but I don't want to get started |
| 46 |
> down a track if it's the wrong one. |
| 47 |
> Did you run into lots of issues in the portage tree? I'm assumming I |
| 48 |
> should use the one I pointed to earlier. I'd prefer not to mix/match |
| 49 |
> from the normal tree. But I'm open to suggestions on the best way to |
| 50 |
> proceed. |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
With the profile I made (apart from the openssl issue) I was able to |
| 53 |
emerge system. That is, everything I needed I added to the tree with |
| 54 |
keyword ~amd64. That might give some trouble for you as well. Oops. |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
-- |
| 58 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 59 |
Gentoo for Mac OS X Project |
| 60 |
-- |
| 61 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |
Archives