Gentoo Archives: gentoo-performance

From: Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-performance@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] test
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 06:02:17
Message-Id: 20040313060943.GD26415@phaenix.haell.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-performance] test by teh_afv-13
1 On Fri, 2004-03-12, 21:15:40 +0200, teh_afv-13 <teh_afv-13@×××××××××.za>
2 wrote:
3 >>Citeren Konstantin Arkhipov <voxus@×××××××.ee>:
4 >>>On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:21:54 +0100 Martin Zwickel
5 >>><martin.zwickel@×××××××××××.de> wrote:
6 >>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:15:46 +0300 Konstantin Arkhipov
7 >>>> <voxus@×××××××.ee> bubbled:
8 >>>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:14:04 -0300 Maximiliano Fern_ndez
9 >>>>> <mafe@××××××××××.uy> wrote:
10 >>>>>
11 >>>>>> test
12 >>>>>>
13 >>>>> passed :)
14 >>>>
15 >>>> Wow, my 2nd mail I got on this list...
16 >>>
17 >>>it's a good sign.. it means that there is no problems with
18 >>>performance in gentoo ;D
19 >>
20 >>:) keep it that way :)
21 > Are there any benchies comparing 1.4 to 2004.0?
22 >
23 > Would make some interesting reading.
24
25 Way to take the fun out of a perfectly irrelevant conversation. :P
26
27 --
28 Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"?
29 Kusanagi: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action.
30 --Ghost in the Shell
31
32 --
33 gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-performance] test Markus Nigbur <pYrania@g.o>