Archives
Archives
| From: | Stephan Feder <sf@×××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-performance@g.o | ||
| Cc: | jesse@×××××××××××.net | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-performance] Re: tmpfs Questions | ||
| Date: | Mon, 12 May 2003 17:07:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | 3EBFD79B.5A7101BE@b-i-t.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-performance] tmpfs Questions by MAL |
||
| 1 | MAL wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > Jesse Jacobs wrote: |
| 4 | > > I've read about a deadlock condition. |
| 5 | > > What would constitute a oversive tmpfs? |
| 6 | > > I thought anything unable to be allocated would be paged out to swap. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > No, if you run out of tmpfs, that's it.. you're out of disk space.. it |
| 9 | > wont use swap to emulate disk space. |
| 10 | ... |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Not true. tmpfs lives in virtual memory, not physical memory only. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Regards, |
| 15 | Stephan |
| 16 | |
| 17 | -- |
| 18 | gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-performance] Re: tmpfs Questions | MAL <mal@×××××××.com> |