Gentoo Archives: gentoo-performance

From: Konstantin Arkhipov <voxus@×××××××.ee>
To: gentoo-performance@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] test
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:46:13
Message-Id: 20040312204609.46bd1646@shadanakar.incom.ru
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-performance] test by Martin Zwickel
1 it's a good sign.. it means that there is no problems with performance
2 in gentoo ;D
3
4 On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:21:54 +0100
5 Martin Zwickel <martin.zwickel@×××××××××××.de> wrote:
6
7 >
8 > Wow, my 2nd mail I got on this list...
9 >
10 > On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:15:46 +0300
11 > Konstantin Arkhipov <voxus@×××××××.ee> bubbled:
12 >
13 > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:14:04 -0300
14 > > Maximiliano Fern_ndez <mafe@××××××××××.uy> wrote:
15 > >
16 > > > test
17 > > >
18 > > passed :)
19 > >
20 >
21 >
22 > --
23 > MyExcuse:
24 > The salesman drove over the CPU board.
25 >
26 > Martin Zwickel <martin.zwickel@×××××××××××.de>
27 > Research & Development
28 >
29 > TechnoTrend AG <http://www.technotrend.de>
30 >
31
32
33 --
34 voxus
35 :wq
36
37 --
38 gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-performance] test maartenlameris@××××××.nl