Gentoo Archives: gentoo-performance

From: Joel Merrick <joel@×××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-performance@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum?
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:03:01
Message-Id: 416A847A.3050501@joelmerrick.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum? by Roman Gaufman
1 Roman Gaufman wrote:
2
3 >On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:35:45 +0100, Joel Merrick <joel@×××××××××××.com> wrote:
4 >
5 >
6 >>Rather than a forum, wouldn't it be better to implement an acutal
7 >>performance DB?
8 >>
9 >>
10 >>
11 >What?
12 >
13 >
14
15 A 'proper' database that contains your hardware, architecture,
16 optimization flags, hdparm, kernel & tuning, phase of the moon, mother's
17 horroscope ;)
18
19 You know what I mean! Not just a mish-mash of forum posts. ;)
20
21 >
22 >
23 >>b.t.w... it might have been knocked off the thread, but where's the
24 >>entry for actual hardware specifics? Arch, CPU, RAM etc..
25 >>
26 >>
27 >
28 >Hardware specific issues go to kernel/hardware, hardware specific
29 >*performance* issues would go to the performance forum. Where's the
30 >mistery?
31 >
32 >
33 >
34
35 Sorry, I never took these to be 'issues', only an aid to assessing your
36 systems performance against others... where IS the mistery? I can't find it?
37
38 Re-read the original post..
39
40 1) CFLAGS
41 2) LDFLAGS
42 3) Acovea
43 4) FS benchmarks
44 5) Raid benchmarks
45 6) Random performance patches like modifying /etc/init.d
46 7) Random sysctrl settings
47 8) Hdparm settings
48 9) Random hard drive benchmarks
49 10) Any other tips like nfs configuration.
50
51
52 Err... where's the hardware?
53
54 It *might* be important to know.. appologies if this was noted in a prior mail to this, but that's why I asked the question.
55
56
57
58 >--
59 >gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list
60 >
61 >
62 >
63
64
65 --
66 gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum? Roman Gaufman <hackeron@×××××.com>