Archives
Archives
| From: | Mikko Husari <husku@×××××.net> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-performance@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-performance] Optimal fstab on raid |
| Date: | Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:53:02 |
| Message-Id: | 45C76E51.3090202@husku.net |
| 1 | hi! |
| 2 | |
| 3 | i was wonderin, what kind of partition + fs table would be optimal on |
| 4 | server and/or desktop. afaik, /usr/portage would be on its own |
| 5 | partition, and perhaps reiserfs and raid0. distfiles should be on a |
| 6 | different partition, so it would not be in the way of portage itself... |
| 7 | but, what about other parts of gentoo/linux. and is raid0+reiserfs just |
| 8 | begging for trouble? |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | gentoo-performance@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| SV: [gentoo-performance] Optimal fstab on raid | Daniel Armyr <daniel.armyr@××××.se> |