Gentoo Archives: gentoo-perl

From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o>
To: gentoo-perl@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-perl] [g-cpan] to clean or noclean
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 13:28:32
How about cpan related stuff keep (the .cpan/CPAN .cpan/sources directories), 
the build and ebuild related we let get wiped (since that's all generated for 
one time use)?

On Sunday 15 May 2005 09:03, Antoine Raillon wrote:
> Le dimanche 15 mai 2005 à 08:26 -0400, Michael Cummings a écrit : > > There are arguments for both sides of this one, and I'm completely open. > > Granted, might help if I looked at what it was we were cleaning to see if > > there was anything we could trim out of the routine anyway. Thoughts? > > Well, maybe it's not for now as we're feature freezed, but what about > different default behaviour according to which action is requested ? > for example, after searching we keep the stuff, while after > installing/upgrading we delete it ? > of course, later, we can override both by setting default behaviour in > an external config file.. :) (not very compatible with feature freeze > too ;p) > > -- > cab
-- -----o()o--------------------------------------------- Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev | on -----o()o--------------------------------------------- -- gentoo-perl@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-perl] [g-cpan] to clean or noclean Antoine Raillon <antoine.raillon@××××××.net>