Gentoo Archives: gentoo-perl

From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o>
To: gentoo-perl@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-perl] [g-cpan] to clean or noclean
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 13:28:32
Message-Id: 200505150926.21552.mcummings@gentoo.org
1 How about cpan related stuff keep (the .cpan/CPAN .cpan/sources directories),
2 the build and ebuild related we let get wiped (since that's all generated for
3 one time use)?
4
5
6 On Sunday 15 May 2005 09:03, Antoine Raillon wrote:
7 > Le dimanche 15 mai 2005 à 08:26 -0400, Michael Cummings a écrit :
8 > > There are arguments for both sides of this one, and I'm completely open.
9 > > Granted, might help if I looked at what it was we were cleaning to see if
10 > > there was anything we could trim out of the routine anyway. Thoughts?
11 >
12 > Well, maybe it's not for now as we're feature freezed, but what about
13 > different default behaviour according to which action is requested ?
14 > for example, after searching we keep the stuff, while after
15 > installing/upgrading we delete it ?
16 > of course, later, we can override both by setting default behaviour in
17 > an external config file.. :) (not very compatible with feature freeze
18 > too ;p)
19 >
20 > --
21 > cab
22
23 --
24 -----o()o---------------------------------------------
25 Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
26 Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net
27 -----o()o---------------------------------------------
28
29 --
30 gentoo-perl@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-perl] [g-cpan] to clean or noclean Antoine Raillon <antoine.raillon@××××××.net>