Gentoo Archives: gentoo-perl

From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o>
To: gentoo-perl@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-perl] why different ebuilds for perl and libperl?
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:11:54
Message-Id: 1166188291.24991.0.camel@sys947.dtic.mil
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-perl] why different ebuilds for perl and libperl? by Christian Hartmann
1 On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 08:08 +0100, Christian Hartmann wrote:
2 > IIRC we decided on merging libperl and perl in the future.
3 >
4
5
6 but then came a discussion on -dev about how the static flag wasn't
7 intended for deciding whether you wanted a static or dynamic library,
8 which put this whole debate back into question as to whether it fit the
9 "rules."
10
11 --
12
13 -----o()o----------------------------------------------
14 Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
15 Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net
16 Gentoo/SPARC
17 Gentoo/AMD64
18 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E
19 -----o()o----------------------------------------------

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-perl] why different ebuilds for perl and libperl? Antoine Raillon <antoine.raillon@××××××.net>