| 1 |
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:16:22 -0800 |
| 2 |
"Michael Higgins" <mhiggins@×××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hello, List -- |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Shot in the dark here... anyone on the list using any big, |
| 7 |
> multi-module perl packages but finding that g-cpan just ain't doin' |
| 8 |
> it for ya? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> If so, anyone find a suitable practice to avoid it? (Outside of |
| 11 |
> making an ebuild, of course.) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I've found that CPAN is just fine to use in the past. But g-cpan |
| 14 |
> doesn't seem to do much except get in the way when given a build of |
| 15 |
> any real complexity. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> It seems like maybe CPAN.pm could be patched to emerge any modules |
| 18 |
> maintained the portage when needed by CPAN. If I dump g-cpan, should |
| 19 |
> I also emerge -C any modules built with portage and build them with |
| 20 |
> CPAN? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Any thoughts or advice much appreciated. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Thanks, |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
You know, if you gave me an example package I could see about getting |
| 27 |
g-cpan working for you ;) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
~mike, g-cpan guy |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-----o()o---------------------------------------------- |
| 35 |
Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl |
| 36 |
Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net |
| 37 |
Gentoo/SPARC |
| 38 |
Gentoo/AMD64 |
| 39 |
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E |
| 40 |
-----o()o---------------------------------------------- |
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
gentoo-perl@g.o mailing list |
Archives