Gentoo Archives: gentoo-perl

From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o>
To: gentoo-perl@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-perl] gnome-1 && gtk-perl
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:00:47
As most of you are probably aware, the gnome team has decided to remove 
gnome-1 from the tree because it is a drain on their resources to support (my 
wording for it). While I can sympathize and understand the argument, we 
(perl) have more than a few modules/apps that rely on this gnome-1 support to 
function. A few Gentoo developers, such as spyderous, have offered to 
continue to support gnome-1 to help keep their apps alive, and have asked if 
we would like to be a part of that. Rather than arbitrarily say yes all on my 
lonesome (since we all know my hard core c/c++ skills are lacking), I'd like 
to ask your opinions. Just to give a brief sample, we're talking about 
packages like gtk-perl, glade-perl (which would be moved under gtk-perl per a 
pending bug, but I didn't see the point in pursuing that while gtk-perl was 
package.masked), bins, and the associated modules. 


Michael Cummings   |    #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev    |    on 
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7  8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E
gentoo-perl@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-perl] gnome-1 && gtk-perl Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o>