| 1 |
well, beu would probably answer better than me |
| 2 |
svn supports branching of cours, how is the question ;) |
| 3 |
and having a full tree support.. dunno if it's useful, but it can be done |
| 4 |
;p |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
need an expert opinion on this one ;p |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
In case we join everything in a big toolkit, is using the |
| 9 |
svn-with-full-tree the best way to do it ? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I mean, the final aspect of the package sould be considered. If we import |
| 12 |
g-cpan now in a tree structure and add each small prog one after the other, |
| 13 |
it'll be easy (but changing package name en route would be mandatory then). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
So, to summarize, we've different solutions : |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
1/ we put every tool in a tree structure right now and release a new |
| 18 |
package |
| 19 |
2/ we let g-cpan in his own tree (full-tree compliant) and think about |
| 20 |
merging way later |
| 21 |
3/ we don't touch anything ;) (except maybe a name change) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
/me is not sure this mail is really clear.. bah, will see ;p |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Michael Cummings |
| 30 |
<mcummings@gento |
| 31 |
o.org> Pour |
| 32 |
gentoo-perl@l.g.o |
| 33 |
12/05/2005 15:00 cc |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Objet |
| 36 |
Veuillez Re: [gentoo-perl] perl gentoolkit ? |
| 37 |
répondre à |
| 38 |
gentoo-perl@gent |
| 39 |
oo.org |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
Still a good idea - was more on the horizon type idea (not this week). But |
| 48 |
your right, changing now is better than later :) |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
While we're at changing though - do we want to consider a different dir |
| 51 |
structure? Like a bin/ man/ lib? set of dirs to store in? How does svn |
| 52 |
handle |
| 53 |
branching? (or do we even need to worry about branching?) I only ask |
| 54 |
because |
| 55 |
the tarball I push up when this is in portage has a bin/ and man/ (well, |
| 56 |
you |
| 57 |
know, for the script and the man page...duh...sorry...) and I wasn't sure |
| 58 |
if |
| 59 |
there was anything like that we should be doing on the back end (not |
| 60 |
burning |
| 61 |
on this one - i'm easy either way, just thought I'd throw it out there if |
| 62 |
dirs were going to get moved around anyway). |
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
On Thursday 12 May 2005 08:14 am, antoine.raillon@××××.com wrote: |
| 66 |
> dunno if this idea is still around, is it ? |
| 67 |
> |
| 68 |
> in case it is, we could use the same SVN as now, but then the 'gcpan' |
| 69 |
name |
| 70 |
> would be obsolete. changing it now would be easy, while waiting will give |
| 71 |
> more work ;p |
| 72 |
> |
| 73 |
> change / not change ? |
| 74 |
> |
| 75 |
> speak now or never ;) |
| 76 |
> |
| 77 |
> -- |
| 78 |
> cab |
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
-- |
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
-----o()o--------------------------------------------- |
| 83 |
Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl |
| 84 |
Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net |
| 85 |
-----o()o--------------------------------------------- |
| 86 |
[rattachement "attfjkfq.dat" supprimé par ANTOINE RAILLON - |
| 87 |
E233469/users/PSA] |
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
-- |
| 91 |
gentoo-perl@g.o mailing list |
Archives